Political commentary? Disagreement about art? No, the issue that has professionals locked in combat is, of all things, the number of spaces that should follow a period.
Afarhad Manjoo’s article, “Space Invaders,” addresses this dispute. He writes, “Typing two spaces is totally, completely, utterly, and inarguably wrong.” When mono-spaced type was used on typewriters, two spaces after a period increased readability and cleanliness on the page. With the advent of electric typewriters and auto-spacing on computers, space-space became unnecessary. Considering this has been going on since the 1970s, why is this still a sensitive topic with no consistency in practice?
The answer to this would probably be, “Because that’s what we’re used to.” Since many of us learned two spaces when we were learning to type- 20, 30, 40 years ago, we never consciously thought of it again.
Who is to say that one or two spaces after a period is cleaner, simpler, or prettier? Afarhad Manjoo makes his opinion clear. The question should be – will we be consistent in teaching students a space-after-period rule in the future?
Read the full article for more.








Don’t try looking it up on your calendar because it isn’t there. As far as I can tell, there is no Hug a CPA Day, at least not in English-speaking countries. But I say it’s time to show some love to the ones who count. Here’s why.